Compare fertility rates between Eastern and Western African countries
The question
441352Compare fertility rates between Eastern and Western African countries
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
Compare fertility rates between Eastern and Western African countries
Task conventions: Use the frozen country polygons and World Bank SP.DYN.TFRT.IN 2022 column, in births per woman. These are country-level indicators, not a subnational surface or a new regional aggregation. Join the supplied ISO_A3 to Country Code exactly. Nonmatching identifiers and missing measurements remain unknown; do not guess them or substitute another year. Retain every original country feature in the declared geography and its benchmark_row_id, including unknowns. No data must have a distinct map category, not zero. Create a quantitative choropleth with five quantile classes (fewer only if tied values collapse breaks), a visible legend with numeric bounds and units, and a neutral No data category. Values equal to a class break enter the upper class. Preserve negative and genuine zero values. This fixed classification and year are disclosed evaluation conventions; do not retrieve live replacements. Count original boundary features, not deduplicated sovereign states; preserve all source rows that meet the declared geography. Country-code sentinels such as -99 remain unmatched. Geography is fixed to original country features with SUBREGION in ["Eastern Africa", "Western Africa"]; retain all matching source geometries, and no others. Classification is calculated only over this geography. Membership reflects this disclosed benchmark edition, not current organization membership. Also compare unweighted means of known original country features by these fixed SUBREGION groups: {"Eastern_Africa": ["Eastern Africa"], "Western_Africa": ["Western Africa"]}. Do not treat missing values as zero. These are country comparisons, not basin-clipped or population-weighted estimates.
Add the resulting quantitative country layer to the map and retain an inspectable data artifact containing the original country geometry, benchmark_row_id, numeric value and class. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: countries with a known numeric value, unknown_count: countries without one, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}, value_field: numeric_column_name, class_field: classification_column_name, map_layer_id: delivered_layer_id}. The artifact must include known AND unknown countries, not only the known subset. Explain the year, units, key limitations and legend in the final response. Include a metrics object in the final JSON with group-name keys and their numeric means (or null if no known members), and explain the comparison.
Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.
Supplied immutable inputs:
[
{
"name": "World Bank country boundaries",
"edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
"units": {},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
},
{
"name": "Fertility rate",
"edition": "Frozen WDI; use 2022",
"units": {
"2022": "births per woman"
},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
}
]Outcome & verification
Independent artifact and delivery checks passed.
- Duration
- 16m 16s
- Recorded Blue tool calls
- 51
- Total tokens
- 2,571,901
- Model cost
- Not recorded
- Application revision
- d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
- Release
- terra-geobenchx-v1
Recorded final answer
Independent checks
These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.
- Expected count
- 34
- Reported count
- 34
- Computation verified
- Yes
- Answer fulfilled
- Yes
Full grading and rubric record
{
"expectedCount": 34,
"actualCount": 34,
"expectedMetrics": {
"Eastern_Africa": 3.873944444444444,
"Western_Africa": 4.4128125
},
"actualMetrics": {
"Eastern_Africa": 3.873944444444444,
"Western_Africa": 4.4128125
},
"computationCorrect": true,
"answerFulfilled": true,
"adjudication": null,
"qualification": null,
"reasons": []
}Recorded investigation findings
The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.
run_trial · completed
Does the fixed Eastern/Western Africa workflow retain the correct original country features, join the supplied 2022 fertility values exactly, classify them into quantiles with a distinct No data category, and produce the required unweighted subgroup means?
assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient
The tested method retained 35 original country features in the fixed geography, with 18 Eastern Africa rows and 17 Western Africa rows. The exact left join preserved all retained features and left 1 row unknown: Saint Helena (ISO_A3 SHN) had no matching Country Code and a null 2022 fertility value, which remained class 0 rather than being filled. Known 2022 values ranged from 1.32 to 6.749 births per woman, and the classifier produced classes 1 through 5 plus class 0 for No data. The subgroup comparison used known rows only and returned mean 2022 fertility of 3.873944444444444 for Eastern Africa and 4.4128125 for Western Africa.
assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient
The delivered country artifact retains 35 original benchmark country features in the fixed geography, with 18 Eastern Africa rows and 17 Western Africa rows. The exact left join matched 34 rows and left 1 retained row unknown: Saint Helena (ISO_A3 SHN) has null Country Code and null 2022 fertility, and remains class 0 rather than being filled. The delivered choropleth uses five quantile classes over the retained geography plus a separate No data class, with breaks at 3.6522, 3.9432, 4.3324, and 4.6626 births per woman. The delivered subgroup summary uses known rows only and reports an unweighted mean of 3.873944444444444 births per woman for Eastern Africa and 4.4128125 for Western Africa, so Western Africa is higher by about 0.5389 births per woman. The delivered layer is on the map as layer [resource id withheld].
Recorded workflow
- 01
Classify fertility values
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 02
Fertility rate by country, 2022
Recorded output · succeeded
- 03
Eastern and Western Africa mean fertility, 2022
Recorded output · succeeded
- 04
Join frozen fertility values
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 05
Mean fertility by subregion
Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded
- 06
Select Eastern and Western African countries
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
- 07
blue-generated--[resource id withheld]
Recorded source · succeeded
- 08
blue-generated--[resource id withheld]
Recorded source · succeeded
- 09
Classify fertility values
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
- 10
Join frozen fertility values
Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded
- 11
Mean fertility by subregion
Recorded table-group-statistics · succeeded
- 12
Select Eastern and Western African countries
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
- 13
blue-generated--[resource id withheld]
Recorded source · succeeded
- 14
blue-generated--[resource id withheld]
Recorded source · succeeded
- 15
Classify fertility values
Recorded output · succeeded
- 16
Mean fertility by subregion
Recorded output · succeeded
Activity
Recorded actionsRecorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.
Progress update
I’m checking the saved analysis context and the exact Blue tool shapes first, then I’ll test the country join and classing on the supplied frozen inputs before I submit the map result.
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I found no saved analysis for this request. Next I’m inspecting the two frozen inputs so I can use their exact fields and item selections, then I’ll test the join and classing on the fixed Eastern/Western Africa geography.
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
get_map_context
Recorded tool call · completed
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve confirmed the exact input fields, including `ISO_A3`, `SUBREGION`, `benchmark_row_id`, `Country Code`, and `2022`. Now I’m checking the processor schemas so I can test the exact left join, fixed geography filter, quantile choropleth, and group means without guessing any inputs.
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
search_locations
Recorded tool call · completed
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve got the exact fields and processor contracts. I’m now running the full fixed method privately first so I can confirm row retention, exact join behavior, quantile breaks, and the two group means before I publish the map layer.
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The private test finished successfully. I’m checking the classified output in more detail now so I can confirm the retained country count, the one unknown value, and the quantile legend before I publish the final layer.
get_trial_report
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The test already showed 35 retained country features and the two subgroup means. I’m doing one focused inspection of the classified artifact now to verify the actual class field, the single unknown row, and the final map-ready legend behavior before I publish it.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The private method is confirmed. I’m saving that tested method as the production workflow now, with the map layer plus the subgroup summary as final deliverables, so I can run it and bind the verified result to your map.
propose_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The saved draft is almost ready. I only need to correct one bookkeeping mismatch: the workflow contract scope has to match the workflow’s executable scope exactly. Then I can run it and bind the final map layer.
get_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
get_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
get_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
revise_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The production workflow is ready and matches the tested method. I’m starting that saved run now so I can inspect the final artifacts and add the verified country layer to your map.
execute_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The saved run finished in the background. I’m inspecting its final outputs now, then I’ll add the verified country layer to the map and record the answer object against those exact final artifacts.
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
The final workflow run already completed. I’m just fetching its exact output receipts now so I can add the delivered country layer to the map and record the answer against the final artifacts, not the trial copy.
Progress update
The final map output is already on your map as layer `[resource id withheld]`. I’m doing two bounded checks now: the final country artifact for the retained rows and unknown row, and the final summary/means so the recorded answer uses the exact delivered artifacts and legend.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
Both final inspections finished while the turn was interrupted. I’m reading those exact final receipts now so the accepted answer uses the delivered country artifact and the delivered subgroup summary, not the trial copy.
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
list_map_layers
Recorded tool call · completed
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I have the final delivered artifacts, the map layer binding, the quantile breaks, and the two subgroup means. I’m checking the exact `assess_result` input shape once so the accepted answer object points to the final artifacts and layer correctly.
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I’ve confirmed the final outputs and the live map layer. I’m refreshing the saved brief so it reflects delivered results instead of earlier “not yet confirmed” planning notes, then I’ll record the final assessment with the exact artifact selections.
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
Progress update
I have everything needed: the final country artifact, the final subgroup summary, the class breaks, and the live layer binding. I’m recording the accepted result now with the exact final output selection and map layer.
assess_result
Recorded tool call · completed