Research/Terra/ 763412

Task evidence / contour-map

Create contour lines from Chile's population density data in relation to rivers

FailComputational taskUnpublished draft

Download evidence JSON ↓

The question

763412

Create contour lines from Chile's population density data in relation to rivers

Exact submitted task and declared adaptations

Create contour lines from Chile's population density data in relation to rivers

Task conventions: First derive people/km2 from original WorldPop 2020 people-per-cell counts by dividing each valid count by its original full WGS84 ellipsoidal meridian/parallel cell area in km2; apply scale/offset, preserve zeros, grid and NoData. Use band 1 of the frozen chile_population raster at the original grid without resampling, smoothing or clipping. Draw the explicit contour levels [50, 100, 200, 400, 800] in people/km2. These levels are a disclosed evaluation convention, not a requested interval. Use piecewise-linear marching-squares isolines through pixel-center values, low-valued connectivity at ambiguous saddles. Respect the native mask, NoData and nonfinite cells; do not bridge holes or extrapolate at the outside edge. Apply any source scale and offset. NoData means unknown, never zero. Preserve source coverage; levels outside the observed range may have no line. Do not substitute a current raster. Count nonempty requested contour LEVELS, not polyline fragments. Contour the derived density, NOT the original counts. Overlay the supplied sa_rivers original geometries on the same map. Retain original overlay features matching predicate intersects against each original countries polygon selected by NAME_EN='Chile'; duplicated matches count once. Do not clip the line geometries. A dissolved union of the selected country polygons is equivalent for intersects. This is a visual spatial comparison; no invented causal correlation or extra buffer is requested. This is a visual comparison, not an estimate of population specifically living near rivers. FAO-derived outputs are internal research only, not promotional publication.

Deliver an inspectable vector contour artifact and add it to the map with a level/units legend. End with one fenced JSON object containing: count (number of nonempty requested levels), unknown_count (number of masked or nonfinite source pixels), coverage_note, selection: {collectionId,itemId,assetKey}, level_field, feature_count (actual contour feature rows), map_layer_id. Also include overlay: {selection: {collectionId,itemId,assetKey}, map_layer_id, count}, retaining original benchmark_row_id. Explain the source season/year, units, missing coverage, and visual relationship where an overlay is requested.

Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.

Supplied immutable inputs:
[
{
"name": "Chile population count, WorldPop 2020",
"edition": "2020 UN-adjusted population counts aggregated to 1 km cells",
"units": {
"band1": "people per cell"
},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
},
{
"name": "FAO AQUAmaps South American river segments",
"edition": "Frozen regional HydroSHEDS-derived rivers_samerica_37330; internal research only, no promotional sharing",
"units": {},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
},
{
"name": "World Bank country boundaries",
"edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
"units": {},
"collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
"itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
"assetKey": "data"
}
]

Outcome & verification

Contour legend levels, distinguishable colors or units are incorrect.

Duration: 34m 7s
Recorded Blue tool calls: 94
Total tokens: 6,294,618
Model cost: Not recorded
Application revision: d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
Release: terra-geobenchx-v1

Recorded final answer

Done. The map now shows Chile’s WorldPop 2020 annual population-density contours in people/km² and the intersecting original river segments. Missing raster coverage stayed unknown, not zero. Visually, the higher-density contours cluster along Chile’s main populated corridor, while the river network spans a broader north-to-south pattern. This is a visual comparison only, and the river overlay remains internal-research-only. ### Limitations - This is a visual comparison only; it does not estimate population living near rivers. - The FAO/HydroSHEDS river overlay is internal research only and not for promotional publication. - Masked or nonfinite raster cells remain unknown and are never treated as zero. - WorldPop source year is 2020 annual UN-adjusted population counts aggregated to about 1 km cells; no seasonal breakdown is provided. - Masked raster cells remain unknown, not zero: unknown_count is 22670617 and nonfinite_count is 0. - The FAO/HydroSHEDS-derived river overlay is internal research only and this result is a visual comparison, not a population-near-river estimate. - Masked cells remain unknown, and the result only covers the supplied raster footprint. - Contour lines appear only where those levels occur in valid cells. - The overlay is for visual comparison only and does not measure population near rivers.

Independent checks

These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.

Expected count: 5
Reported count: 5
Computation verified: No
Answer fulfilled: No

Full grading and rubric record

{
  "expectedCount": 5,
  "actualCount": 5,
  "expectedMetrics": null,
  "actualMetrics": null,
  "computationCorrect": false,
  "answerFulfilled": false,
  "adjudication": null,
  "qualification": null,
  "reasons": [
    "Contour legend levels, distinguishable colors or units are incorrect."
  ]
}

Recorded investigation findings

The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.

run_trial · completed

Does the full Chile workflow convert the supplied WorldPop band 1 counts to people/km2 on the original grid and mask, produce contour lines only at the requested density levels, and retain whole river segments intersecting Chile once without clipping?

run_trial · completed

Can I keep the original river benchmark_row_id field unsuffixed by dissolving the selected Chile polygon before the spatial intersects filter?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: insufficient

The trial answered most of the method question. The derived density raster kept the original EPSG:4326 grid, 5166 by 4618 cells, unit people/km2, and output scale/offset 1 and 0. The full raster summary reported 23,856,588 total cells, 1,185,971 valid cells, 22,670,617 missing cells, and 0 nonfinite cells, so the native unknown mask was preserved. The contour output produced 4,618 LineString features, used only the requested level field values 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800, and reported level distinctCount 5, so all requested contour levels were nonempty. The river overlay kept whole original river geometries, matched 4,110 river features against Chile, and did not clip them. However, because both inputs carried benchmark_row_id, the join output renamed the river ID field to benchmark_row_id_target instead of preserving the original river benchmark_row_id field name for the final inspectable overlay artifact.

assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient

Dissolving the selected Chile polygon removed the join-side field collision. The corrected river overlay still returned 4,110 original whole river features intersecting Chile, with no clipping, and the output kept the original river benchmark_row_id field name unsuffixed. The spatial join still used whole-target intersection on original geometries, so duplicate matches were not introduced by clipping or area pruning.

run_trial · completed

Can I create a map-ready contour display layer with a legend by classifying the exact contour artifact on its level field without changing the contour geometry or level values?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient

The classified contour display output kept the same 4,618 contour features, preserved the original level and contour_id fields, and added only a display-oriented level_class field. The geometry preview and counts matched the underlying contour artifact, so classification did not change the contour lines. The classified output is therefore suitable as a map layer with a real legend keyed to the contour levels in people/km2.

run_trial · completed

Can I build a legend-ready contour display layer that keeps the same contour geometry and gives a separate display class to each requested contour level 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 people/km2?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient

The revised classified contour display kept the same 4,618 contour features and preserved the original level field. Its level_class field now has five distinct nonempty classes, matching the five requested contour levels 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 people/km2. The output remains an inspectable vector contour artifact suitable for the final map layer with a separate legend class for each requested level.

assess_result · failed · requested assessment: sufficient

I delivered a legend-ready contour artifact derived from the supplied WorldPop 2020 counts raster and an overlay of Chile-intersecting FAO/HydroSHEDS river segments. The density conversion preserved the native grid and unknown mask; the full density summary reported 22,670,617 masked cells and 0 nonfinite cells. All five requested contour levels are nonempty, producing 4,618 contour features. The cleaned river overlay preserves 4,110 original uncut river features with benchmark_row_id. Visually, the higher population-density contours cluster along Chile’s main populated corridor while the river overlay traces a broad north-to-south network; this remains a visual spatial comparison only, not an estimate of population living near rivers or a causal claim.

assess_result · failed · requested assessment: sufficient

Using the supplied WorldPop 2020 annual UN-adjusted population-count raster, the final workflow derived people/km2 on the native Chile grid and preserved the native unknown mask. The final contour deliverable contains 4618 vector contour features and all five requested levels 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 people/km2 are nonempty. The final overlay keeps 4110 original Chile-intersecting river features with benchmark_row_id preserved and no clipping. Exact density coverage summary reports 22670617 masked cells and 0 nonfinite cells, so unknown coverage remains unknown rather than zero. Visually, the higher-density contours cluster along Chile’s main populated corridor while the river network spans a broader north-south pattern; this is a visual comparison only, not an estimate of population near rivers or a causal claim.

assess_result · failed · requested assessment: sufficient

assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient

Recorded workflow

01
Select Chile country polygons
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
02
Dissolve Chile polygon
Recorded vector-dissolve · succeeded
03
Contour derived population density
Recorded raster-contours · succeeded
04
Legend-ready contour display
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
05
Supplied country boundaries
Recorded source · succeeded
06
Chile population density contours (people/km2)
Recorded output · succeeded
07
Chile-intersecting rivers
Recorded output · succeeded
08
Chile density coverage summary
Recorded output · succeeded
09
Convert counts to population density
Recorded raster-count-density · succeeded
10
Summarize derived density raster
Recorded raster-statistics · succeeded
11
Supplied Chile population count raster
Recorded source · succeeded
12
Keep river segments intersecting Chile
Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded
13
Supplied South America rivers
Recorded source · succeeded
14
contours classified levels
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
15
contours source
Recorded source · succeeded
16
contours classified levels
Recorded output · succeeded
17
contours classified
Recorded vector-classify · succeeded
18
contours source
Recorded source · succeeded
19
contours classified
Recorded output · succeeded
20
chile
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
21
chile dissolved
Recorded vector-dissolve · succeeded
22
countries source
Recorded source · succeeded
23
rivers chile clean
Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded
24
rivers source
Recorded source · succeeded
25
chile dissolved
Recorded output · succeeded
26
rivers chile clean
Recorded output · succeeded
27
Select Chile country polygons
Recorded vector-filter · succeeded
28
Contour derived population density
Recorded raster-contours · succeeded
29
Supplied country boundaries
Recorded source · succeeded
30
Convert counts to population density
Recorded raster-count-density · succeeded
31
Summarize derived density raster
Recorded raster-statistics · succeeded
32
Supplied Chile population count raster
Recorded source · succeeded
33
Keep river segments intersecting Chile
Recorded vector-spatial-join · succeeded
34
Supplied South America rivers
Recorded source · succeeded
35
Select Chile country polygons
Recorded output · succeeded
36
Convert counts to population density
Recorded output · succeeded
37
Summarize derived density raster
Recorded output · succeeded
38
Contour derived population density
Recorded output · succeeded
39
Keep river segments intersecting Chile
Recorded output · succeeded

Activity

Recorded actions

Recorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.

07:49:49 UTC
Progress update
I’m checking the supplied datasets and the available geospatial processors first, then I’ll test the contour method on a small private slice before I submit the full run.
07:49:57 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
07:49:57 UTC
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
07:49:57 UTC
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:00 UTC
get_collection
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:13 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · failed
07:50:13 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · failed
07:50:14 UTC
Progress update
I found the three supplied inputs. Next I’m checking the raster’s native grid and mask, plus the boundary and river fields needed to keep only rivers that intersect Chile.
07:50:17 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · failed
07:50:23 UTC
Progress update
The direct artifact preview needs a prepared source snapshot first. I’m switching to item metadata and then a small source-only trial so I can inspect the real grid, fields, and mask without changing the data.
07:50:23 UTC
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:24 UTC
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:24 UTC
get_item
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:31 UTC
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:31 UTC
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:32 UTC
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:33 UTC
list_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:53 UTC
Progress update
I have the right processor candidates. Now I’m reading their exact input schemas so I can test the real method instead of guessing parameters.
07:50:53 UTC
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:53 UTC
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:50:58 UTC
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:51:05 UTC
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:51:05 UTC
describe_processors
Recorded tool call · completed
07:51:25 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
07:51:25 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
07:51:25 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
07:51:32 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
07:52:13 UTC
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
07:52:32 UTC
Progress update
I’m running one full private test now. It checks the exact density conversion, the exact contour levels, and the uncut Chile river selection together so I can inspect the real outputs before I publish them.
07:52:39 UTC
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
07:55:07 UTC
get_trial_report
Recorded tool call · completed
07:55:27 UTC
Progress update
The private test finished successfully. I’m checking the preview images and a few exact fields now so I can verify the visible relationship and make sure the overlay keeps the original river IDs cleanly in the final output.
07:55:56 UTC
Progress update
I found one cleanup issue. The river test kept the right features, but the shared field name was suffixed to `benchmark_row_id_target`. I’m testing a lighter overlay variant now so the final river artifact can keep the original river `benchmark_row_id` field name cleanly.
07:56:00 UTC
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
07:56:11 UTC
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
07:59:45 UTC
get_trial_report
Recorded tool call · completed
07:59:45 UTC
Progress update
The cleanup test finished. I’m confirming the corrected river field and then I’ll add the final contour and river layers to your map.
07:59:51 UTC
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
08:00:00 UTC
Progress update
I’m doing one last display-only step so the contour layer has a proper map legend. It will reuse the exact contour lines you already asked for and won’t change their geometry or levels.
08:00:03 UTC
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
08:01:31 UTC
Progress update
I have the final pieces now: the exact contour lines, a display version with a legend, and the cleaned river overlay. I’m binding those to the map and then I’ll record the selected result object.
08:01:48 UTC
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
08:01:49 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:01:49 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:01:49 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:01:56 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
08:02:11 UTC
Progress update
I’ve confirmed the legend-ready contour layer too. I’m reading the exact artifact references next so the final recorded result points to the right map layers and output items.
08:02:18 UTC
add_result_layer
Recorded tool call · failed
08:02:19 UTC
add_result_layer
Recorded tool call · failed
08:02:33 UTC
Progress update
The layers were not auto-bindable from workflow IDs alone. I’m pulling the exact processor job receipts now, then I’ll attach the verified outputs with the right map IDs.
08:02:33 UTC
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
08:02:33 UTC
list_map_layers
Recorded tool call · completed
08:02:35 UTC
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
08:02:37 UTC
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
08:03:17 UTC
Progress update
I have the exact output items now. I’m binding them as generated map layers instead of processor-job layers, then I’ll verify the live layer IDs before I record the final result.
08:03:17 UTC
add_catalog_layer
Recorded tool call · completed
08:03:18 UTC
add_catalog_layer
Recorded tool call · completed
08:04:06 UTC
Progress update
I found one last display detail to improve: the first legend version grouped the top two contour levels together. I’m correcting that now so the legend can represent all five requested levels separately on the map.
08:04:09 UTC
run_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:36 UTC
assess_trial
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:39 UTC
add_catalog_layer
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:43 UTC
Progress update
The five-class legend version is ready. I’m switching the contour map binding to that latest artifact, then I’ll verify the live layer list and record the final result.
08:05:48 UTC
list_map_layers
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:48 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:49 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:49 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:05:49 UTC
Progress update
I’ve attached the corrected contour layer. I’m verifying the live layer IDs and refreshing the inspected evidence one last time before I seal the final answer object.
08:06:27 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:06:27 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:06:29 UTC
Progress update
The contour display inspection finished in the background. I’m pulling that result and the river preview now, then I’ll record the final selected output and map bindings.
08:06:30 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:07:11 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
08:08:10 UTC
update_analysis_brief
Recorded tool call · completed
08:08:55 UTC
assess_result
Recorded tool call · failed
08:09:36 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:36 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:36 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:38 UTC
Progress update
The result selection step rejected private trial artifacts, so I’m promoting the tested method into a final workflow now. That will give you proper final outputs for the accepted answer instead of trial-only items.
08:09:44 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:44 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:48 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:48 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:56 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:56 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:56 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:09:58 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:10:08 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:10:33 UTC
get_tool_help
Recorded tool call · completed
08:10:44 UTC
Progress update
I’ve turned the tested method into a final production workflow draft. It uses the same verified processing steps, but it will generate final outputs instead of trial-only artifacts.
08:11:20 UTC
propose_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
08:11:33 UTC
Progress update
The final workflow draft is valid, but Blue needs one short plan-resolution note because the first overlay attempt had a field-name problem. I’m recording that fix against the saved final workflow now, then I can run it.
08:11:33 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
08:11:52 UTC
assess_plan
Recorded tool call · completed
08:11:58 UTC
Progress update
The workflow is now cleared to run. I’m executing it to create the final non-trial contour, river, and coverage-summary outputs that Blue can accept in the final answer.
08:11:59 UTC
execute_workflow
Recorded tool call · completed
08:14:00 UTC
Progress update
The approved workflow finished in the background. I’m inspecting the final non-trial outputs now so I can bind the accepted map layers to those exact final artifacts, not the earlier trial copies.
08:14:01 UTC
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
08:14:01 UTC
list_map_layers
Recorded tool call · completed
08:14:03 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
08:14:32 UTC
Progress update
I have the final workflow outputs and their bound map layers. I’m fetching their exact final artifact references now so Blue can attach the accepted answer to the final items instead of the earlier trial copies.
08:14:33 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
08:15:14 UTC
Progress update
I’ve got the final workflow outputs and final layer IDs. I’m doing one last direct inspection on those exact final outputs so the accepted answer is tied to the final published artifacts, not just matching trial checksums.
08:15:14 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:15:14 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:15:15 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:16:40 UTC
Progress update
The final-output inspections are ready in the background. I’m reading them now and then I’ll seal the accepted result against the final workflow artifacts.
08:16:41 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:16:41 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:16:43 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:18:06 UTC
Progress update
I’ve finished the method and final workflow. I’m checking the final non-trial outputs now so I can record the accepted result and return the map layers.
08:18:17 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:18:17 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:18:23 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:18:25 UTC
Progress update
I found the final workflow outputs. I’m pulling the inspected receipts for the contour layer, river overlay, and density coverage summary so the final result is tied to the actual map layers.
08:18:30 UTC
Progress update
I have the inspected previews and coverage summary. I’m pulling the final output references now so the accepted result points to the exact non-trial artifacts.
08:18:30 UTC
inspect_workflow_results
Recorded tool call · completed
08:18:31 UTC
get_analysis
Recorded tool call · completed
08:19:16 UTC
Progress update
One last check: I’m reading the final derived density raster itself so the final assessment can explicitly tie the contour layer back to the native Chile grid and mask.
08:19:20 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:20:34 UTC
Progress update
The final artifacts are verified and already on the map. I’m refreshing the saved brief notes so the remaining limitations match the actual finished outputs, then I’ll record the final answer object.
08:20:41 UTC
Progress update
I’m attaching the final density-grid inspection as supporting evidence now. After that I can record the accepted result with the exact output IDs already on your map.
08:20:42 UTC
inspect_artifact
Recorded tool call · completed
08:21:41 UTC
Progress update
I’m recording the accepted final result now with the exact contour artifact, river overlay, coverage summary, and current map layer bindings.
08:21:57 UTC
assess_result
Recorded tool call · failed
08:22:07 UTC
Progress update
Blue asked for the acceptance checks in their exact wording. I’m correcting that now and re-recording the final result against the same inspected outputs.
08:22:26 UTC
assess_result
Recorded tool call · failed
08:22:34 UTC
Progress update
I’ve narrowed the assessment to the exact six required acceptance checks from the saved brief. Re-recording now.
08:22:49 UTC
assess_result
Recorded tool call · completed

The question

Outcome & verification

Recorded final answer

Independent checks

Recorded investigation findings

Recorded workflow

Select Chile country polygons

Dissolve Chile polygon

Contour derived population density

Legend-ready contour display

Supplied country boundaries

Chile population density contours (people/km2)

Chile-intersecting rivers

Chile density coverage summary

Convert counts to population density

Summarize derived density raster

Supplied Chile population count raster

Keep river segments intersecting Chile

Supplied South America rivers

contours classified levels

contours source

contours classified levels

contours classified

contours source

contours classified

chile

chile dissolved

countries source

rivers chile clean

rivers source

chile dissolved

rivers chile clean

Select Chile country polygons

Contour derived population density

Supplied country boundaries

Convert counts to population density

Summarize derived density raster

Supplied Chile population count raster

Keep river segments intersecting Chile

Supplied South America rivers

Select Chile country polygons

Convert counts to population density

Summarize derived density raster

Contour derived population density

Keep river segments intersecting Chile

Activity

Progress update

get_analysis

get_collection

get_collection

get_collection

inspect_artifact

inspect_artifact

Progress update

inspect_artifact

Progress update

get_item

get_item

get_item

list_processors

list_processors

list_processors

list_processors

Progress update

describe_processors

describe_processors

describe_processors

describe_processors

describe_processors

get_tool_help

get_tool_help

get_tool_help

get_tool_help

update_analysis_brief

Progress update

run_trial

get_trial_report

Progress update

Progress update

run_trial