Research/Terra/ 965287
Task evidence / country-choropleth

Map rural population distribution in Central Asian nations

PassComputational taskUnpublished draft
Download evidence JSON ↓

The question

965287
Map rural population distribution in Central Asian nations
Exact submitted task and declared adaptations
Map rural population distribution in Central Asian nations

Task conventions: Use the frozen country polygons and World Bank SP.RUR.TOTL 2023 column, in people. These are country-level indicators, not a subnational surface or a new regional aggregation. Join the supplied ISO_A3 to Country Code exactly. Nonmatching identifiers and missing measurements remain unknown; do not guess them or substitute another year. Retain every original country feature in the declared geography and its benchmark_row_id, including unknowns. No data must have a distinct map category, not zero. Create a quantitative choropleth with five quantile classes (fewer only if tied values collapse breaks), a visible legend with numeric bounds and units, and a neutral No data category. Values equal to a class break enter the upper class. Preserve negative and genuine zero values. This fixed classification and year are disclosed evaluation conventions; do not retrieve live replacements. Count original boundary features, not deduplicated sovereign states; preserve all source rows that meet the declared geography. Country-code sentinels such as -99 remain unmatched. Geography is fixed to original country features with SUBREGION in ["Central Asia"]; retain all matching source geometries, and no others. Classification is calculated only over this geography. Membership reflects this disclosed benchmark edition, not current organization membership.



Add the resulting quantitative country layer to the map and retain an inspectable data artifact containing the original country geometry, benchmark_row_id, numeric value and class. End with one fenced JSON object: {count: countries with a known numeric value, unknown_count: countries without one, coverage_note: string, selection: {collectionId, itemId, assetKey}, value_field: numeric_column_name, class_field: classification_column_name, map_layer_id: delivered_layer_id}. The artifact must include known AND unknown countries, not only the known subset. Explain the year, units, key limitations and legend in the final response.

Delivery format: provide the answer object with all fields specified above as final_response on assess_result, alongside the inspected final artifact_refs. This replaces the JSON-code-block formatting requirement above. Blue attaches your explicit selection to the accepted final answer. Finish with a concise ordinary-language answer agreeing with that selected result; do not duplicate the JSON in chat.

Supplied immutable inputs:
[
  {
    "name": "World Bank country boundaries",
    "edition": "GeoBenchX harmonized names",
    "units": {},
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  },
  {
    "name": "World Bank SP.RUR.TOTL",
    "edition": "Frozen GeoBenchX World Development Indicators; use 2023",
    "units": {
      "2023": "people"
    },
    "collectionId": "blue-generated--[resource id withheld]",
    "itemId": "[resource id withheld]",
    "assetKey": "data"
  }
]

Outcome & verification

Independent artifact and delivery checks passed.

Duration
12m 52s
Recorded Blue tool calls
45
Total tokens
2,259,685
Model cost
Not recorded
Application revision
d50497ea9084f29c91b05406688f87035df98d8a
Release
terra-geobenchx-v1

Recorded final answer

Done — the 2023 rural population choropleth is on your map for the 5 benchmark Central Asia country features. It uses the frozen World Bank SP.RUR.TOTL 2023 values in people, with 5 quantile classes and breaks at 4,132,743.8, 6,134,419.8, 7,696,750.2, and 10,260,454.6; no countries are unknown in this edition, so the No data class is available but unused. Limitation: this is a country-level benchmark map, not a within-country rural population surface, and Central Asia membership follows the supplied benchmark boundary edition rather than current organization membership. Next: hover the countries to inspect each feature’s `benchmark_row_id`, 2023 value, and class. Sources: supplied World Bank country boundaries benchmark fixture and supplied frozen World Bank SP.RUR.TOTL 2023 benchmark table, Blue-hosted copies retrieved 2026-10-07 UTC. ### Limitations - The user fixed the supplied boundary and indicator snapshots, the 2023 year, and the exact ISO_A3 to Country Code join, so this workflow does not replace them with live updates or alternate identifiers. - This result maps country-level 2023 totals only; it does not estimate rural population distribution within countries. - No retained Central Asia country is unknown in this benchmark edition, so the distinct No data handling is supported by the classifier but unused in the final map. - This is a country-level 2023 benchmark choropleth, not a within-country rural population surface. - Central Asia membership follows the supplied benchmark boundary edition, not current organization membership. - The result uses the supplied frozen benchmark snapshots and exact join rule, not live updates or alternate identifiers. - No retained country is unknown in this geography, so the neutral No data category is available but unused on this map. - Country membership is fixed by the supplied benchmark boundary rows using SUBREGION = Central Asia. - The result uses the frozen SP.RUR.TOTL 2023 column in people and keeps unmatched or missing values unknown. - Values equal to a class break enter the upper class, and missing values use a distinct No data class.

Independent checks

These checks are separate from the agent's own assessment. A successful job or an assertion of success is not enough to pass.

Expected count
5
Reported count
5
Computation verified
Yes
Answer fulfilled
Yes
Full grading and rubric record
{
  "expectedCount": 5,
  "actualCount": 5,
  "expectedMetrics": null,
  "actualMetrics": null,
  "computationCorrect": true,
  "answerFulfilled": true,
  "adjudication": null,
  "qualification": null,
  "reasons": []
}

Recorded investigation findings

The agent's reported hypotheses and assessments, retained as evidence of its process—not independent proof that the answer is correct. Failed calls retain their requested verdict, not an accepted assessment.

run_trial · completed

Do the supplied benchmark country boundaries filter to the benchmark Central Asia rows, join exactly from ISO_A3 to Country Code for SP.RUR.TOTL 2023, and produce a quantitative choropleth with preserved unknowns and quantile classes?

assess_trial · completed · assessment: sufficient

The filter kept 5 country features and all retained rows had SUBREGION = Central Asia, preserving benchmark_row_id and geometry. The exact left join from ISO_A3 to Country Code matched all 5 retained countries with 0 unmatched input features and 0 null 2023 values. The classifier used the joined 2023 field in people, produced 5 quantile classes with breaks at 4,132,743.8; 6,134,419.8; 7,696,750.2; and 10,260,454.6, and assigned one country to each class. The classifier summary states a lower-inclusive, upper-exclusive convention, which means a value exactly on a break enters the upper class, and missing data would use class 0 rather than zero as a numeric value.

assess_result · completed · assessment: sufficient

The final output retains the 5 benchmark Central Asia country features, preserves benchmark_row_id and geometry, joins the frozen World Bank SP.RUR.TOTL 2023 values exactly from ISO_A3 to Country Code, and classifies the known values into 5 quantile classes. All 5 retained countries have known 2023 values in this frozen edition, so the No data category is supported but unused here. The delivered choropleth artifact is blue-generated--[resource id withheld] / [resource id withheld] / data, and the verified map layer ID is [resource id withheld].

Recorded workflow

  1. 01

    Benchmark country boundaries

    Recorded source · succeeded

  2. 02

    Keep benchmark Central Asia countries

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  3. 03

    Classify 2023 rural population

    Recorded vector-classify · succeeded

  4. 04

    Central Asia rural population 2023 choropleth

    Recorded output · succeeded

  5. 05

    Join 2023 rural population by exact code

    Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded

  6. 06

    Frozen SP.RUR.TOTL table

    Recorded source · succeeded

  7. 07

    Benchmark country boundaries

    Recorded source · succeeded

  8. 08

    Keep benchmark Central Asia countries

    Recorded vector-filter · succeeded

  9. 09

    Classify 2023 rural population

    Recorded vector-classify · succeeded

  10. 10

    Join 2023 rural population by exact code

    Recorded table-attribute-join · succeeded

  11. 11

    Frozen SP.RUR.TOTL table

    Recorded source · succeeded

  12. 12

    Keep benchmark Central Asia countries

    Recorded output · succeeded

  13. 13

    Join 2023 rural population by exact code

    Recorded output · succeeded

  14. 14

    Classify 2023 rural population

    Recorded output · succeeded

  15. 15

    Classify 2023 rural population

    Recorded output · succeeded

Activity

Recorded actions

Recorded observable actions only, not private reasoning. Raw payloads, geometry, private links and credentials are omitted; full evidence is retained privately. Activity/workflow lists bounded at 500 entries.

  1. Progress update

    I’ll first inspect the supplied boundary and indicator files so I can confirm the exact fields, Central Asia membership, and a safe way to keep unknowns distinct. Then I’ll run a small private test of the join and classing before I save the full map workflow.

  2. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  3. get_map_context

    Recorded tool call · completed

  4. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  5. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  6. Progress update

    I found the two frozen benchmark inputs. They’re managed snapshots, so I’m now checking the exact item schema and sample values to confirm the join fields and the benchmark geography before I test the method.

  7. get_item

    Recorded tool call · completed

  8. get_item

    Recorded tool call · completed

  9. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · failed

  10. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  11. get_collection

    Recorded tool call · completed

  12. update_analysis_brief

    Recorded tool call · completed

  13. Progress update

    I now have the exact source fields: the boundary file includes `SUBREGION`, `ISO_A3`, and `benchmark_row_id`, and the WDI table includes `Country Code` and `2023`. Next I’m finding the right processors for an exact attribute filter, join, and quantile class assignment, then I’ll test the full method on the supplied snapshots.

  14. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  15. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  16. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  17. list_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  18. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  19. describe_processors

    Recorded tool call · completed

  20. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  21. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  22. run_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  23. get_trial_report

    Recorded tool call · completed

  24. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  25. Progress update

    The private test finished and the core method worked: the benchmark filter returned 5 Central Asia country features, the exact code join matched all 5, and the classing produced 5 quantile classes. I’m checking the saved trial outputs in a bit more detail now, then I’ll save the production workflow from that tested method and add the final layer to the map.

  26. Progress update

    The first test answered the main question, but one rule still needs confirmation before I can finish: whether a value exactly on a class break goes into the upper class, as required. I’m inspecting the joined rows now and then I’ll run one small equality check using the retained trial output instead of rebuilding the whole method.

  27. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  28. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  29. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  30. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  31. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  32. Progress update

    I’ve already confirmed the five retained countries and their joined 2023 values from the classified trial output. Next I’m pulling the exact workflow proposal schema so I can save the tested method cleanly and promote it to the final map layer without rebuilding it by guesswork.

  33. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  34. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  35. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  36. Progress update

    I now have the exact joined rows: all five Central Asia boundary features matched the 2023 WDI table one-to-one, with no unknowns in this geography. I’m pulling the exact proposal contract fields next so I can save the tested workflow with the right source-to-result bindings and move straight to final execution.

  37. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  38. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  39. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  40. assess_trial

    Recorded tool call · completed

  41. propose_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

  42. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  43. get_tool_help

    Recorded tool call · completed

  44. Progress update

    The saved draft only needs one correction: the copied trial scope stayed at the world bbox, while the contract correctly says the study area is Central Asia. I’m fixing the draft in place now so the executable scope and the contract match before I run it.

  45. get_analysis

    Recorded tool call · completed

  46. Progress update

    I’ve got the exact fix: keep the tested steps unchanged, but save them as a direct computation with the Central Asia study bbox instead of the inherited trial-wide bbox. That should make the draft runnable without changing the scientific method.

  47. propose_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

  48. execute_workflow

    Recorded tool call · completed

  49. inspect_workflow_results

    Recorded tool call · completed

  50. get_workflow_run

    Recorded tool call · completed

  51. Progress update

    I’ve confirmed the workflow succeeded and the layer is already on the map. I’m doing one bounded inspection of the final country artifact and the final class summary now so I can record the exact counts, fields, legend breaks, and layer ID in the accepted result.

  52. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  53. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  54. inspect_artifact

    Recorded tool call · completed

  55. assess_result

    Recorded tool call · completed

|||

© 2026 Exia Labs, Inc.